MODEL STREAMING CLOUD RADIO STATION SERVICE

About a model pay for music streaming service. You might consider adding pay for custom music radio station streaming service/chat site with automatic login.

Online music cloud library streaming services need professional organization of songs in a library of sub-directory trees of genre, artists or compilation, albums, and tracks to avoid too clever by half predictive suggestion software created play-list train-wrecks, Play-list management should also not be done by random taggers. I would really like a expertly edited library for a English language white racialist, white power, white pride and hate music radio station. Without expert management to completely pin down the white pride play-list the last.fm white pride play list recommendations play list deviated like hell to at the first chance include foreign language, torture, rap and thrash metal bands, and avoided mainstream popular easy to listen to English language white pride bands like Skrewdriver like the plague.

Genres could be as few as 10 with big playlists not 1,000s of genres with small playlists.

English language genres. A check list would offer the listener genre and language options. Maybe the streaming service provider could provide a list of exclusive check boxes to vote on the genre and language each song limited to 1 vote per song per subscriber. With 10 votes in a genre leading to inclusion in one of 10 genre playlist subject to an appropriate super fan musicologist expert for each genre and language. English and non English would be easy enough to determine by an English speaking musicologists.

01-White power racialist pride, patriotism and hate.

02-Death thrash metal.

03-Black gangster rap hip hop.

04-Classical orchestral instrumental.

05-Opera.

06-Modern female romance, disco, country, pop and rock singers.

07-Modern male romance, disco, country, pop and rock singers.

08-Techno-sequencer-trance

09-Christian music.

10-Oldies songsters recorded more than 35 years ago.[jazz, swing, ballroom dancing]

It is possible to link the song being played up with lyrics sites to display wiki-lyrics on the left 1/4 of the web page for the full lyrics of each song for edit by any user with changes publication requiring approval of a seper fan genre expert. As well as the bottom center 1/4 of the web page for artist or album cover art. The top center of the web page for advertisements except when clicking a button for the twitter like genre chat with subscribers including genre musicologist for requests, Reverting to advertising when left. The remaining right 1/4 of the web page for menus.

I would be willing to pay for streaming of my genre held in cloud to my media center hifi or other online device for 5cents per hour [50cents per 10 hour day and $150 for 300 days per year] just to listen to the stream, 30 cents per hour to turn on stream ripping of songs to mp3 for burning of collection to optical disc or purchase of individual tracks for 20cents each 1/2 for royalties and 1/2 for you the service provider to store my tracks for me for automatic login and play when browser opens main page. Subscribers would pay $50 in advance, for access to pay for services as used, on $5 to expiry subscribers would automatically pay another $50 or opt to receive an email to approve the transaction. I subscribe to mp3va.com similar to this and use my credits to pay 15cents per track but i lost my entire downloaded collection when i accidentally selected delete from my players drop down file menu and fried my hdd. I could download all the songs again for free, but i would rather custom expertly managed radio station cloud streaming from an online library on demand. The provider just storing and backing up 1 of each track for all listeners to listen to and the details of each subscribers collection would be optimal. I would never lose my collection again and could listen to it 24/7/365 at either 128kbps or 256kbps on any multiple upgrade device for about 20% of my monthly download limit.

What also would be useful as my tastes change would be the ability to set the maximum history for affirmation by the love track button and other additions to own library taken into consideration when making free recommendations and for track to play selection set by the user at between 50 and 10,000 songs under own library, reverse-able at any time. All older tracks selections would be purged from view but not deleted completely. Free recommendations would use most recent artist preferences when the user makes new additions to our own library. Another option would be to allow the playlist owner to list all their artists or genre [compilation], albums and tracks, with the playlist owner able to tick on artist to select all album and track by the artist then click on album to deselect or reselect all tracks on the album then deselect or reselect individual tracks.

I fully support using Paypal bill payment because i can control bill payment and subscription modification myself with no trouble. Under per hour streaming, stream ripping and track purchase plans, payments would automatically stop if a person went away or lost interest better matching fee for service so the listener never has to be worried about canceling service and resubscribing as needs fluctuate or being ripped off.

Last.fm has an extensive music library but I have struggled to get the last.fm predictive playlist service to perform to my requirements, my playlist is now more totally pinned down and less out of control after a big effort to chop the every chance the playlist had to deviate usually taken. Selecting "your library", "your recommended" and "your mix" sees Last.fm continually push low quality music against my will and not on my playlist including repeated playing of songs from artists i repeatedly click as hated, including objectionable gangster rap, thrash metal and gore, and total ignorance of songs and artists i put in my library and choose to listen to, saying i have run out of my quota of these songs. Rather than play any one of the 100 artists and 1,000s of songs i have in my library and mark love i have been waiting weeks to hear them even once. The excuse being copyright restrictions limit the number of times a song can play, but access to less trashy content is what we pay fees for; the right to listen to songs i the payer want; this should increase royalties to artists, popularity should not be a problem but a boon. last.fm has left listeners with a drivel of crappy rubbish songs left over after songs we want too much are filtered out. Symptoms of absolute failed relied on playlist selection software algorithm and design model, inferior to a human fan as selector. Apart from the basic concept of streaming music from the cloud which would be revolutionary, and extensive library Last.fm couldnt have built a more worthless time demanding dysfunctional high maintenance service. Editing continually corrupted playlists has required much effort. I would be happier with a no fuss genre playlist edited by a team of moderately capable musicologist 1 for each a super-fan of each of 10 genre to pre-organized genres into base playlist library, with the listener really able to block artists and songs and add extra artists or songs from a search-able online raw music library of every album on the planet, with language selection options. Pay per hour of streaming would more closely match price to service so an increase in song popularity would be more lucrative to the streaming provider and artists, and so not a problem limited. A premium price would be paid for a premium service. I hope my suggestions will improve your service. Thank you very much.